was to study the relationship

Korea Data Forum Fosters Collaboration and Growth
Post Reply
lopebix427
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 8:38 am

was to study the relationship

Post by lopebix427 »

Objective of the study. The objective of this work between titers of specific antibodies in biological fluids of patients with HFRS, identified by the indirect method of fluorescent antibodies, and the severity of the clinical manifestation of the infection.

Materials and methods of the study. During the period 2014–2018, the buy estonia phone data presence of specific antibodies to orthohantavirus, the causative agent of HFRS, was established in 274 blood serum samples and 50 urine samples obtained from patients in Primorsky Krai.

For serological diagnostics of the infection in accordance with the provisions of SP 3.1.7.2614–10 [7], an indirect fluorescent antibody method (IFA) was used using the commercial “Cultural, Polyvalent Diagnostician for Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome” according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “M.P. Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for R&D in the Russian Academy of Sciences”). The severity of clinical symptoms of the disease was established according to the clinical guidelines “Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome in Adults” (2016) based on a combination of clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters. The Statistica 6.0 software package was used to process the data. Reliability was assessed using the Student’s t-test; differences were considered significant at p≤0.05.

At the beginning, the author talks in detail about the relevance of the issue raised, highlighting an important problem that requires a solution. The goal is formulated in detail and clearly. Further, the materials and methods of the study are described in detail. The object and subject from the introduction are guessed, but are not clearly highlighted by the author.

Recommendations for the author : indicate the object and subject; add a review of previous research; justify the scientific novelty of the results.
Post Reply