justification for scientific novelty .

[lopebix427]

All three introductions lack
In all three conclusions, the authors did not suggest directions for further development of the topics they had chosen.
Traditionally, authors do the best job with keywords. Hopefully, in the future, there will be fewer and fewer recommendations for improvement.

TOP 3 titles of scientific articles in this issue
1. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODERN APPROACHES TO CONSTRUCTING CORPORATE india telemarketing data MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS

In the article, the authors classify the areas of use of audiovisual systems and consider two architectural approaches used in the construction of corporate multimedia systems, comparing them with "home" solutions (without a single architectural approach); highlight the pros and cons of each approach, including relying on the characteristics of the quality model during use (according to GOST R ISO/IEC 25010–2015).

Keywords : audiovisual systems, audiovisual industry, multimedia complexes, corporate multimedia spaces

A medium-length title allows one to define the general topic of the study, its object and subject. Mention of a comparative analysis confirms that the author has conducted a large independent work, the results of which may have signs of scientific novelty.